<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>devgrind &#187; rails</title>
	<atom:link href="http://devgrind.com/tag/rails/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://devgrind.com</link>
	<description>thinking outside the { }</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 17:25:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Keeping Up with Rails</title>
		<link>http://devgrind.com/2009/02/07/keeping-up-with-rails/</link>
		<comments>http://devgrind.com/2009/02/07/keeping-up-with-rails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 19:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devgrind.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m currently updating a not-so-small application from Rails 2.0.2 to 2.2.2 and it seems that about every other plugin is not compatible with the new version, because one or the other method was removed,  and I have to update them as well. Not such a big problem, if a compatible version exists, but takes quite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m currently updating a not-so-small application from Rails 2.0.2 to 2.2.2 and it seems that about every other plugin is not compatible with the new version, because one or the other method was removed,  and I have to update them as well. Not such a big problem, if a compatible version exists, but takes quite some time, and I don&#8217;t understand that I have to go through this hassle (and <a href="devgrind.com/2008/04/03/use-quote_value-in-rails-2/">other hassles</a>) about everytime I update to a new Rails version. I don&#8217;t remember having this kind of trouble when I was working in Java Land. Can somebody explain?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://devgrind.com/2009/02/07/keeping-up-with-rails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Use quote_value in Rails 2</title>
		<link>http://devgrind.com/2008/04/03/use-quote_value-in-rails-2/</link>
		<comments>http://devgrind.com/2008/04/03/use-quote_value-in-rails-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 19:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[api]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wtf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devgrind.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just a note to all who, like me, wonder why the heck ActiveRecord&#8217;s quote method in model classes doesn&#8217;t work anymore in Rails 2.x: quote seemingly has been replaced by quote_value, though this is not listed on the deprecation page. So if you get an error that says undefined method `quote&#8217; for your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just a note to all who, like me, wonder why the heck ActiveRecord&#8217;s <tt>quote</tt> method in model classes doesn&#8217;t work anymore in Rails 2.x: <tt>quote</tt> seemingly has been replaced by <tt>quote_value</tt>, though this is not listed on the deprecation page. So if you get an error that says <i>undefined method `quote&#8217;</i> for your model class, replace the calls to <tt>quote</tt> by <tt>quote_value</tt>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://devgrind.com/2008/04/03/use-quote_value-in-rails-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ruby &amp; Me: The Beginning</title>
		<link>http://devgrind.com/2007/03/05/ruby-me-the-beginning/</link>
		<comments>http://devgrind.com/2007/03/05/ruby-me-the-beginning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 16:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arne</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rails]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ruby]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://devgrind.com/2007/03/05/ruby-me-the-beginning/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Note: This is part I of an ongoing series on the programming language Ruby.
It all started when I was fed up with developing web applications with PHP or Java (i.e. Struts). I had a rather complex web project ahead and just called it quits with PHP and Java (for web development), because, well, PHP is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Note: This is part I of an ongoing series on the programming language Ruby.</em></p>
<p>It all started when I was fed up with developing web applications with <a href="http://www.php.net/">PHP</a> or Java (i.e. <a href="http://struts.apache.org/">Struts</a>). I had a rather complex web project ahead and just called it quits with PHP and Java (for web development), because, well, PHP is the shortest path for a web developer to the sanitarium and Struts was simply to cumbersome for my taste. And of course there was <a href="http://rubyonrails.com/">Ruby on Rails</a> this <em>super productive</em> new web framework everybody was drooling over, I just had to try it. So I got myself a printout of <a href="http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2005/01/20/rails.html">Rolling with Ruby on Rails</a> to read. And it annoyed me almost from the beginning.</p>
<p>The main reason I didn&#8217;t like <em>Rolling with Ruby on Rails</em> is that it praises <em>Rails</em> to the skies while almost completely failing to mention any of the framework&#8217;s cool, elegant or productivity-boosting features. The whole article is mainly concerned with <a href="http://wiki.rubyonrails.org/rails/pages/Scaffold">scaffolding</a>, a feature which automatically provides a web-based interface for creating, editing, browsing and deleting objects. Its nice to get a first look into the thing, but in my opinion its almost useless for serious development. In my Rails projects, for example, scaffolded code amounts to about 1% (or less) of the overall code, because the application interfaces just don&#8217;t have much in common with the interfaces provided by scaffolding.</p>
<p>Yet there are a lot of cool things to tell about <em>Rails</em>: Its domain specific languages, the powerful ActiveRecord framework, its builtin support for AJAXification, to name a few. <em>Rails </em>owes the ease of using these features mainly to the <a href="http://www.ruby-lang.org/">Ruby</a><em> </em>programming language. So what makes <em>Rails</em> cool are basically the same things that make <em>Ruby</em> cool, applied masterly.</p>
<p>Thus, in the course of this series, I will present the distinctive language features of <em>Ruby</em> that are key for frameworks like <em>Ruby on Rails</em> and made me fall in love with <em>Ruby</em> almost instantly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://devgrind.com/2007/03/05/ruby-me-the-beginning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
